Wikileaks and the Right to Know

Posted December 22nd, 2010 at 1:38 pm (UTC-4)
1 comment

Does National Security Trump Freedom of the Press?

Elizabeth Lee | Washington

Sensitive information released by the Wikileaks website has generated a  heated debate in the United States: should the news media publish  classified information, and does it compromise national security?  And who decides?

Those questions, and others, after the jump.

State secrets revealed by Wikileaks have unleashed endless news reports about information the U.S. government would rather not be made public. “We have more of an expectation in this country that we are entitled to this information. We are entitled to know what our government is doing with our tax money,” said Lucy Dalglish, the executive director of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. She says Americans have the right to speak freely without government censorship.  And that includes journalists. The exception is if great harm or violence results in what is said or published.

Former CIA analyst James Bruce says publishing classified information harms U.S. national security because it reveals secrets to America’s enemies. “When they monitor the U.S. press, they discover enormously valuable pearls of understanding about how we collect intelligence information and they use that information to develop counter measures to our collection capabilities. Typically the press has no real idea, has no technical understanding of the damage what that can cause,” he said.

“We don’t just willy-nilly take classified information and put it out there. If we are not experts in an area, (we) see experts to make sure that the information we’re presented, first of all, is accurate to give perspective,” said Hagit Limor, the president of the Society of Professional Journalists. She says reporters have the responsibility to weigh any potential harm, and to verify information before publishing a story. “We’re only looking for information that we feel adds to the public debate, perhaps question how government might do things in order to find better ways to do them. That’s our role,” she said.

But James Bruce argues that journalists lack accountability themselves.  “I believe the Department of Justice has been excessively inhibited and restrained in its ability to identify and to hold accountable journalists who traffic, and there are several who do, in highly classified information,” he said.

The U.S. government has not successfully prosecuted the media for publishing stories based on receiving classified information. And now with the Internet making secrets even more vulnerable, some lawmakers want to update the 1917 Espionage Act to better protect classified information.

One Response to “Wikileaks and the Right to Know”

  1. [...] that Bradley Manning will spend the rest of life behind bars. The larger issues remain untested: who is a journalist, what constitutes a secret, and how can they be stopped once they’re out there on the [...]

Leave a Reply

What’s Digital Frontiers?

What’s Digital Frontiers?

The Internet, mobile phones, tablet computers and other digital devices are transforming our lives in fundamental and often unpredictable ways. “Digital Frontiers” investigates how real world concepts like privacy, identity, security and freedom are evolving in the virtual world.

Find us on twitter

Calendar

December 2010
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031