Studies Disagree on Origins of Monogamy

Posted July 30th, 2013 at 5:33 pm (UTC-4)
Comments are closed

Newly married couple enjoying a sunset (Thejas via Creative Commons/Flickr)

Newly married couple enjoying a sunset (Thejas via Creative Commons/Flickr)

Two new competing studies disagree on the origins of monogamy but both agree it had nothing to do with romance.

Researchers at Cambridge University found social monogamy  originated as a male mating strategy which evolved over the years.  Males pushed for monogamous relationships after finding themselves in situations where females lived far apart from each other or there was a lack of potential female mates, leaving the male unable to dominate and defend multiple mates.

“Where females are widely dispersed, the best strategy for a male is to stick with one female, defend her, and make sure that he sires all her offspring.” said Tim Clutton-Brock, a Cambridge researcher involved with the study. “In short, a male’s best strategy is to be monogamous.”

The other study, led by the University College London, finds the basis for monogamy to be rooted in the  male need to protect its offspring from  unrelated males.

This team  also found that males not only protected their children, but also took on the role of caregiver, sharing childcare tasks with the female, after the idea of monogamy began to take hold.

A family of Barbary macaques in Gibraltar (Harry Mitchell via Wikimedia Commons)

A family of Barbary macaques in Gibraltar (Harry Mitchell via Wikimedia Commons)

“This is the first time that the theories for the evolution of monogamy have been systematically tested, conclusively showing that infanticide is the driver of monogamy,” said Dr Kit Opie, from the University College of London who served as lead author of the study.  “This brings to a close the long running debate about the origin of monogamy in primates.”

The caregiving aspect of the UCL study, say the researchers, became a necessity for primates in particular because they were evolving into creatures that developed much bigger brains than other mammalian species.

Growing a big brain  meant offspring  matured more slowly. With most other animal species, children were left to fend for themselves soon after birth.  In primate species, a prolonged childhood required that both mom and dad be involved with taking care of the offspring, according to the UCL researchers.

They say  this may also explain how large brains were able to evolve in humans.

Rick Pantaleo
Rick Pantaleo maintains the Science World blog and writes stories for VOA’s web and radio on a variety of science, technology and health topics. He also occasionally appears on various VOA programs to talk about the latest scientific news. Rick joined VOA in 1992 after a 20 year career in commercial broadcasting.

Comments are closed.