Student Union
- By Doug Bernard
Life During Shutdown
This just might be what some of my colleagues call a "teachable moment." Or, it just might be a longish silence.
As I expect many of you have heard, the U.S. federal government is in a partial shutdown. Partial because some government services, like the border patrol or air traffic control, remain operating, and shutdown because other elements of the government are not.
The why of the shutdown is both very simple and stupefyingly complex. First, the simple. Every year, starting October 1st, the U.S. Congress must approve - and the President must sign - a budget to fund federal government operations. If a budget is not signed for any part of the government, that part simply cannot operate as technically there is no money to be spent.
This year, Congress was unable to agree on funding nearly any part of the government, with the one exception of pay for active-duty military personnel. That means that large parts of the Executive branch, and perhaps some parts of the Judicial branch in the near future, will have to be shut down. Smart observers will note that there's one branch missing here: the Legislative branch. All of Congress remains fully funded, thanks to the 27th amendment to the Constitution which specifies that salaries in the House and Senate cannot change until after a congressional election.
Now, some parts of the government are still operating, despite not being funded. For example, mail delivery will continue, Social Security checks will go out, and even here at the VOA, live radio and TV broadcasts will continue, despite the fact that none of those employees will be paid until Congress approves appropriations for the government - that's because those and other services are considered to be in national security interests.
That said, large parts of the federal government will not be open. And sadly, that includes the "Student Union", for the time being.
Believe it or not, all that was the easy part. Some government services are open, some are closed, and that will be the state of affairs until Congress acts and the President approves. Pretty much end of story.
The stupefyingly complex part of the answer revolves around the many policy debates and political divisions that currently roil the American landscape. Key among those is the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, commonly referred to as "Obamacare." Explaining the hows and whys of those differences could fill a newspaper and then some...and I, as your editor, only am allowed a few more hours to work before I have to shut down myself.
Here's the point: until the federal government is fully funded, it's unlikely the "Student Union" will be up and running. That''s a shame, as I'm sure many of our new team of contributors have much to say. I wish I could share those stories, but I won't be allowed to. In fact, I won't even be allowed to check incoming emails from you all, let alone answer them. No Facebooking, no tweeting - no nothing.
We've set up a few posts for auto-publish. That means they were prepared pre-shutdown, and I just programmed the blog to automatically publish them on a certain date and time. Additionally, until we're allowed back to work, I won't be able to post or reply to any comments you leave.
So if this is a teachable moment, when we return I hope we all can share some perspectives on this. That, and move forward with your thoughts, questions and perspectives on studying here in the U.S.
Apologies for the temporary silence, but we'll be back very soon - I hope. Until then, best of luck to all in your classes!
See all News Updates of the Day
- By VOA News
Studying STEM? International students have funding options
US News & World Report takes a look at funding options for international students pursuing STEM degrees in the U.S.
The article explains the different kinds of scholarships and grants and offers tips on getting part-time jobs and private student loans. Read the full story here. (March 2024)
- By Robin Guess
US campuses are battlegrounds in free speech debate
This week the University of Southern California canceled the graduation speech of its senior class valedictorian at a time when there is a growing debate over the limits of free speech on American college campuses.
USC’s Asna Tabassum, a Muslim biomedical engineer major, was selected from among 100 outstanding students to address the graduating class of 2024 this May. However, the school withdrew the invitation for her to speak at the graduation ceremony citing safety concerns.
Tabassum denounced the decision, which she attributed to her public support for Palestinian human rights. She said it is part of “a campaign of hate meant to silence my voice.”
The school maintains it is a safety issue, not about free speech. School officials say they received an alarming number of violent threats after selecting her as speaker.
USC is one of many American universities that have struggled with policies over free speech and campus protest since October’s Hamas terrorist attack on Israel and the continuing fighting in Gaza. After weeks or months of on-campus protests and rallies, schools have been taking more forceful action to punish protesters who administrators say have become disruptive.
On Thursday at Columbia University in New York, police arrested more than 100 students who had gathered on campus for pro-Palestinian protests. The school’s dean wrote that the protesters had been told several times that they were violating university policies and would be suspended. The students say they were exercising their free speech rights.
At Washington’s American University, protests in all campus buildings have been banned by the school’s president since January. Under the new policy, students may not hold rallies, engage in silent protests or place posters in any campus building.
Protests and safety
University students have a long history of engaging in political activism. From the Vietnam War to abortion rights, universities have played a key role in American political debates.
However, students now say that schools like AU with a long-standing protest culture are silencing protesters with new rules.
Arusa Islam, American University student body president-elect and current vice president, says the policies are preventing an open discussion about U.S. foreign policy.
“Indoor protesting was never a problem, it was never an issue before October 7th,” Islam said. “Students were allowed to put up posters in buildings and students were allowed to have a silent protest.”
“And now we don’t have that right anymore,” she added. “We have been silenced and it is affecting us greatly.”
American University’s president, Sylvia Burwell, says the school’s new policies are intended to ensure that protests do not disrupt university activity.
Burwell also referred to recent events on campus that “made Jewish students feel unsafe and unwelcome.” She added, antisemitism is abhorrent, wrong, and will not be tolerated at American University.
While administrators insist that they are making narrow restrictions in the interests of providing an education, critics say the policies have a far-reaching effect.
At Cornell University, where new rules took effect in January, Claire Ting, the executive vice president of the Cornell Student Assembly, said the policies have had an unsettling effect on campus.
“The campus climate at Cornell has been tense surrounding free speech in recent times,” Ting emailed VOA.
Ting said that both students and faculty feel the policy has had chilling effects on free expression.
“Students report facing arbitrary, escalating punishment for violating the policy, with the policy itself lacking clear outlines for the consequences of civil disobedience,” she added.
In its new policy Cornell warns students that disciplinary action may be taken if protests impede people or traffic, damage school property or interfere with the school’s operations in any way.
In its campus-wide notice explaining the new guidelines, the school wrote that the new policy would ensure that expressive activity is allowed but must remain nonviolent.
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, also known as FIRE, has tracked free speech issues on American campuses.
FIRE and College Pulse have produced an annual survey, since 2022, ranking colleges based on their policies and what students say about the free speech climate on campus.
This year the group reported that “alarming” numbers of students say they self-censor or “find their administrations unclear” on free speech issues.
“College campuses have always been places where students have been unafraid to express themselves and with the recent Gaza conflict after the 10/7 attacks, it’s been very heated on both sides of this issue,” said Zach Greenberg, the senior program officer of FIRE.
Harvard ranked last in this year’s survey. FIRE said the school punished some professors and researchers over what they had said or written, and students reported a poor climate for free speech on campus.
The controversy came to Congress late last year, when Harvard’s president testified over complaints of widespread antisemitism.
“I don’t think you’d find many students on campus right now that would say we are the model for flourishing free speech and ideas exchange in the country,” said J. Sellers Hill, president of Harvard’s school newspaper The Harvard Crimson.
“But I think you’ve really seen that be acknowledged by administrators and it seems to be something they are dedicated to taking on.”
As the head of The Harvard Crimson, Hill manages the paper’s 350 editors and 90 reporters, who’ve covered, in detail, the ongoing free speech/protests controversy and the resignation of former President Claudine Gay following her testimony to Congress.
“I think no one would dispute Harvard has work to do and progress to make,” Hill said. “I think it’s a tough sell, for me, that Harvard is uniquely in its own league in terms of intolerance of speech. That doesn’t square with what I have seen on our college campus or on other college campuses around the country. I think Harvard is held to a higher standard.”
Proposed settlement offered over financial aid allegations
A group of U.S. colleges and universities have agreed to settle a lawsuit alleging deceptive financial aid tactics, according to a report published in The Hill.
The schools would pay $284 million to plaintiffs who were enrolled full-time and received financial aid between 2003 and 2024.
The schools have denied the allegations. (April 2024)
Universities in Middle East building research relationships with China
As China bolsters research relationships with universities in the Middle East, the United States has taken notice – especially when that research involves artificial intelligence.
Reporting for University World News, Yojana Sharma has the story. (March 2024)
Tips for staying safe while studying in the US
Recent news events have raised safety concerns among some international students studying in the United States.
Adarsh Khandelwal, writing in the India Times, has tips for staying safe from the moment you arrive until the day you complete your studies. (March 2024)
